Author: Zheng Zhixian
Date: 03:37:04 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 05:33:25, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>I don't know myself. >> >>Professionals who came to WCCC said that Fruit is not a threat for their >>sellings. Others are welcomed to let me know of their opinion by email >>(fabien_letouzey@hotmail.com). However some experts expect more and more Fruit >>clones in future tournaments (including on-the-board ones), especially after the >>performance in WCCC. >> >>There is also the insufficiency (IMO) of the GPL in the chess case that I have >>to ponder on (pun intended). >> >>For these reasons, I have decided so far NOT to release my source code anymore. >>Continuing to do so could harm the community beyond repair, and at the same time >>I believe that public Fruit 2.1 is strong enough to participate in a paradigm >>revolution (skeptical programs or whatever). Would that be possible? To release a binary without the source? I know he's the author does that mean he has the right to do that, GPL or not GPL? >> >>Thanks for listening, >> >>Fabien. > >From what you are saying i gather that you will not release the source code >anymore, and that i think is a good decision, however i don't get a sense of >whether you will still release Fruit alone as an engine, maybe you don't want to >answer this yet so please take your time if that is the case :) > >Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.