Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:16:34 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 12:05:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 24, 2005 at 08:59:28, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On August 24, 2005 at 08:47:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On August 24, 2005 at 08:20:25, Thomas Logan wrote: >>> >>>>Does anyone have scaling figures for various deep programs >>>> >>>>and systems with 2 dual core processors >>>> >>>>Tom >>> >>>hi, i just started a test at my k7 single cpu machine >>>to compare an output created at a quad dual core 1.8Ghz. >>> >>>The test is over 213 positiosn and statistical significant. >>> >>>I expect results within 2 weeks. >>> >>>You can calculate what time it takes 70 minutes * 213 positions. >>> >>>one thing already seems sure: >>> >>>x86-64 has no scaling problems with big hashtables, x86 has. >>> >>>Vincent >> >>Hello Vincent >> >>Thank you >> >>Are you using Diep ? >> >>Any knowledge concerning Fritz, Junior or Shredder >>Please post your results when obtained > >Shredder is scaling 3.3 at quad single core, so that'll be like scaling of 4 at >dual core quad or so? Don't see why. I get somewhere around 3.0 on a quad. I'm getting reasonably close to 6 on the 8-way box. Will have lots of numbers to post later once all the runs finish. But no reason 3.3 on 4 translates to 4.0 on 8. That is hardly a straight-line fit of anything. > >junior was single core and fritz will not be scaling well either (deepfritz8). > >We know all this already from 8 cpu Xeon machines in fact. See results donninger >posted once. > >If you don't run well at 8 cpu xeon then forget dual core. > >>Thanks again >> >>Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.