Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Clones and moral behavior

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 13:55:04 08/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2005 at 15:30:09, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On August 24, 2005 at 12:34:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>You ask if it's already in direction of cloning if you copy Alpha-Beta. I say
>>yes. But that alone wouldn't allow the verdict clone but it's a beginning. If
>>then the next 14 features are simply added without own creativity then it's
>>cloning.
>
>Well, let me see ...
>
>I use:
>
>1. Null move pruning
>2. Zobrist hashing
>3. Static exchange evaluation
>4. Pawn hash table
>5. Futility pruning
>6. Killer moves
>7. History heuristic
>8. PVS
>9. Mailbox move generation
>10. Check extensions
>11. Single reply extensions
>12. KPK bitbase
>13. Piece square tables
>14. Iterative deepening
>
>I could easily make the list longer, but I have already reached the magic
>number of 14.  I have a clone.
>
>Tord


I dont know why you become so aggressive. I saw a photograph from you in Mainz
and I thought, why the guy is always so aggressive towards me since 1997, he
looks so peaceful. Something is wrong here. 14 certainly wasn't meaningful, it
was thought to be just a high number. But ok, you answered at least. - Now my
question: what afterall did you invent yourself in computerchess programming?
And second question: why - after all these copies - is your program not among
the winning ones at tournaments? Please answer without the usual hatred please.
I thank you in advance.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.