Author: Frank Mueller
Date: 14:58:14 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 17:18:02, K. Burcham wrote: >On August 24, 2005 at 16:06:43, Frank Mueller wrote: > >>Is there something in this game, you can be proud of? > >Did you not see the 1-0? maybe you are saying this because you are at a higher >level and are capable of mating early? if so good for you! I admit, a win is a win, even when dead lost. However, Pablo knows about the flawed user interface and concentrates on shuffling pieces hoping to win on time. In my opinion, that's no anti computer style. It might be entertaining to see one or two examples of such games, but then it will become boring. I can only speak for myself, but I never would mention or publish *such* games. >>for example making some strong moves? > >If you are saying that you know for a fact that there are no strong moves in >this game, then it is a fact that no strong moves were necessary for white to >win this game. > >>You were dead lost -- as in almost every game. The playing you call "anti >computer style" only profits from buggy user interface. > >code issues in the interface can be posted here for the programmers information. >If he has the energy to debug, then he will, if not it stays. >I want them posted for improvements. I agree, Chessbase should fix that issue, but in the meantime I seriously doubt that Pablo publishes these games to call attention to this code issue. Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.