Author: Andreas Stabel
Date: 04:35:41 08/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 16:24:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 24, 2005 at 15:45:00, F. Huber wrote: > >>On August 24, 2005 at 15:13:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Can you check again? Just copied both over there again, so they should contain >>>identical source distributions... >>> >>>Bob >> >>The typo in utility.c is corrected now, but what I´m wondering about: why does >>this new source contain quite a lot more (new) files than the previous one!? >> >>Franz. > >No idea. Let me look to see if I screwed up... :) > >yep, I did. download again (after deleting everything) and you will have the >right stuff. I am already whacking things apart, so I went to the backup >directory to make the distribution. Unfortunately it has some old singular >extension code, some text file formatting routines, some old null-move threat >code, etc laying around... None of it will work with current version so it is >of no real use at the moment... Crafty now compiles for single CPU without any source changes, but I still have to remove phase.c and evaluate.h from makefile.nt I downloaded the ZIP file an hour ago and it still has a lot of extra files. I noticed that it is possible to compile the x1.c and x2.c with optimization /Oa (assume no aliasing) turned on and it still works, but I haven't checked if this gives any performance impprovement. The egtb.c cannot be compiled with this option. My newly compiled crafty seems to work very well now and it seems to be faster because it resolves fail highs and lows faster than before and the evaluation also seems to be better in some of the test positions. Thank you very much Mr. Hyatt for providing me with my main analysis tool ! Regards Andreas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.