Author: Uri Blass
Date: 17:37:47 08/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2005 at 20:15:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 25, 2005 at 19:44:47, John Merlino wrote: > >>On August 25, 2005 at 18:12:41, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>[d]rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - >>> >>>White's a GM, black's a computer. I would guess a GM might like white, not >>>sure. Most comps like black due to material, at least initially. >> >>CM9_R1 on an AMD 2500 prefers White, and has a tough time deciding what Black >>should play: >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:01 1/8 1.01 195492 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 Kxg7 3.Bd3 Kh8 4.O-O >> d5 5.cxd5 Rxd5 >>0:02 1/8 0.48 259601 1...d6 2.Ng3 Nd7 3.Ne4 Re6 4.Be2 >> f5 5.Ng3 >>0:03 1/9 1.68 542371 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Ke1 >> Qxc4 5.Ba3 Re6 6.Qb1 Kxg7 >>0:03 1/9 1.24 652429 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.Be2 d4 4.cxd4 >> Qxd4 5.Bb2 Qd6 6.O-O >>0:04 1/9 1.21 771529 1...b6 2.Ng3 d6 3.Be2 Nd7 4.Bf3 >> e4 5.Nxe4 f5 >>0:05 1/9 0.90 1176072 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nc5 4.Be2 >> Qa4 5.Qxa4 Nxa4 6.Nh5 Rd8 >>0:07 1/10 0.87 1522209 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nc5 4.Bc4 >> Kxg7 5.O-O Qa4 6.Qe2 Kg8 >>0:15 1/11 1.02 3731408 1...d5 2.cxd5 b6 3.Ng3 Bb7 4.Be2 >> Bxd5 5.O-O Qa2 6.Bb2 Qb3 >>0:28 1/11 0.59 7062603 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Kd2 Kxg7 4.Nf5+ >> Kf8 5.Nd6 a2 6.Bd3 Qb1 7.Qxb1 axb1=Q >> 8.Bxb1 >>0:52 1/12 0.45 13163255 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Kd2 d5 4.cxd5 >> Nd7 5.Bc4 Nc5 6.Nh5 Rd8 7.Nf6+ Kxg7 >>1:28 1/13 1.54 22944165 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Bd3 e4 4.Nxe4 >> d5 5.cxd5 f5 6.O-O fxe4 7.Bxe4 >> Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Qxc3 9.Qe8+ Kxg7 10.Bf4 >>2:14 1/13 0.91 35190263 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nb6 4.c4 >> Bd7 5.Be2 Nxd5 6.O-O Qc3 7.Qd1 >> Nb6 8.Bg5 >>3:35 2/14 1.07 56970572 1...d5 2.cxd5 a4 3.Ng3 a3 4.Bd3 >> e4 5.Nxe4 f5 6.O-O fxe4 7.Bxe4 >> Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Qxc3 9.Qe8+ Kxg7 10.Be3 >> a2 11.Qe7+ Kg8 >> >>jm > >d5 seems to be the only move(except maybe a4) > >Shredder9 at depth 17: > >New game, >rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: > >1. ² (0.44): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.Ke2 >b6 8.Re1 h6 9.c4 Kf7 10.Ne4 >2. +- (1.82): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Ra1 Kxg7 12.Qb2 Qe5 >3. +- (2.62): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Rh6 4.Bd3 Rh4 5.0-0 Qa4 6.Qe2 Nd7 7.Nf5 >Nc5 8.Ne7+ Kxg7 9.Bf5 Bd7 10.Bg5 f6 >4. +- (2.64): 1...Nc6 2.bxc6 bxc6 3.Ng3 Rb8 4.Be2 Qb1 5.Qxb1 Rxb1 6.0-0 Rb3 >7.Nh5 > >(, 26.08.2005) > >The evaluation of all these moves goes down at depth 18 > >New game, >rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: > >1. ± (0.77): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.c4 h6 >8.f4 exf4 9.Nh5+ Kf7 10.Nxf6 >2. +- (1.89): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Kh1 a3 12.Ra1 h5 >3. +- (2.93): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 h5 3.Be2 h4 4.0-0 hxg3 >4. +- (3.13): 1...Nc6 2.Ng3 Nb4 3.cxb4 > >(, 26.08.2005) > >Itertion 18 still was not finished but 4...Re6 and 4...Nc6 already lost their >place in the top 4. > >New game, >rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: > >1. ± (0.77): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.c4 h6 >8.f4 exf4 9.Nh5+ Kf7 10.Nxf6 >2. +- (1.89): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Kh1 a3 12.Ra1 h5 >3. +- (2.58): 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Kd1 Qb3+ 5.Qc2 Qxc4 6.Nd4 Qc5 7.Nf5 >Nd7 8.Nh6+ Kxg7 9.Qf5 Qd5+ 10.Bd2 Qe6 11.Bd3 e4 12.Re1 >4. +- (2.92): 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 Rc8 5.c4 e4 6.Bxe4 Qxg7 7.0-0 >Re8 8.Bb2 Qh6 9.Qc3 f6 10.Nf5 Bxf5 > >(, 26.08.2005) > > > >Uri Iteration 18 was finished with no change Iteration 19 all moves drop in score but 1...a4 is improving. New game, rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: 1. ± (1.23): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nb6 4.c4 Re7 5.Be2 f5 6.Nh5 Rf7 7.0-0 Qa4 8.Qc3 2. ± (1.39): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 a3 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Bf5 6.0-0 Nd7 7.Ng5 3. +- (2.59): 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Kd1 Qxc4 5.Ng3 Qb3+ 6.Qc2 Qd5+ 7.Qd2 Qb3+ 8.Ke1 Nd7 9.Nf5 Re6 10.Bd3 4. +- (3.13): 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 Rc8 5.c4 e4 6.Bxe4 Qxg7 7.0-0 h5 8.d6 h4 9.Bxb7 hxg3 10.Bxa8 gxh2+ 11.Kxh2 (, 26.08.2005) Rd8 lost the 4th place for Re6 4. +- (3.10): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Re7 4.Bd3 (, 26.08.2005) Re6 lost the 4th place for Nc6 4. +- (2.86): 1...Nc6 2.Ng3 Nb4 3.cxb4 axb4 4.Be2 Ra2 5.Qd1 b3 6.Bg5 Re6 7.0-0 Qxd1 8.Rxd1 Rg6 9.Bd2 d6 10.Ne4 (, 26.08.2005) I will not continue to depth 20 but give more analysis to 1...d5 2.cxd5 and 1...a4 2.Ng3
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.