Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:59:49 08/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2005 at 20:37:47, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 25, 2005 at 20:15:49, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 25, 2005 at 19:44:47, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On August 25, 2005 at 18:12:41, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>>[d]rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - >>>> >>>>White's a GM, black's a computer. I would guess a GM might like white, not >>>>sure. Most comps like black due to material, at least initially. >>> >>>CM9_R1 on an AMD 2500 prefers White, and has a tough time deciding what Black >>>should play: >>> >>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>>0:01 1/8 1.01 195492 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 Kxg7 3.Bd3 Kh8 4.O-O >>> d5 5.cxd5 Rxd5 >>>0:02 1/8 0.48 259601 1...d6 2.Ng3 Nd7 3.Ne4 Re6 4.Be2 >>> f5 5.Ng3 >>>0:03 1/9 1.68 542371 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Ke1 >>> Qxc4 5.Ba3 Re6 6.Qb1 Kxg7 >>>0:03 1/9 1.24 652429 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.Be2 d4 4.cxd4 >>> Qxd4 5.Bb2 Qd6 6.O-O >>>0:04 1/9 1.21 771529 1...b6 2.Ng3 d6 3.Be2 Nd7 4.Bf3 >>> e4 5.Nxe4 f5 >>>0:05 1/9 0.90 1176072 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nc5 4.Be2 >>> Qa4 5.Qxa4 Nxa4 6.Nh5 Rd8 >>>0:07 1/10 0.87 1522209 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nc5 4.Bc4 >>> Kxg7 5.O-O Qa4 6.Qe2 Kg8 >>>0:15 1/11 1.02 3731408 1...d5 2.cxd5 b6 3.Ng3 Bb7 4.Be2 >>> Bxd5 5.O-O Qa2 6.Bb2 Qb3 >>>0:28 1/11 0.59 7062603 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Kd2 Kxg7 4.Nf5+ >>> Kf8 5.Nd6 a2 6.Bd3 Qb1 7.Qxb1 axb1=Q >>> 8.Bxb1 >>>0:52 1/12 0.45 13163255 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Kd2 d5 4.cxd5 >>> Nd7 5.Bc4 Nc5 6.Nh5 Rd8 7.Nf6+ Kxg7 >>>1:28 1/13 1.54 22944165 1...a4 2.Ng3 a3 3.Bd3 e4 4.Nxe4 >>> d5 5.cxd5 f5 6.O-O fxe4 7.Bxe4 >>> Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Qxc3 9.Qe8+ Kxg7 10.Bf4 >>>2:14 1/13 0.91 35190263 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nb6 4.c4 >>> Bd7 5.Be2 Nxd5 6.O-O Qc3 7.Qd1 >>> Nb6 8.Bg5 >>>3:35 2/14 1.07 56970572 1...d5 2.cxd5 a4 3.Ng3 a3 4.Bd3 >>> e4 5.Nxe4 f5 6.O-O fxe4 7.Bxe4 >>> Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Qxc3 9.Qe8+ Kxg7 10.Be3 >>> a2 11.Qe7+ Kg8 >>> >>>jm >> >>d5 seems to be the only move(except maybe a4) >> >>Shredder9 at depth 17: >> >>New game, >>rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: >> >>1. ² (0.44): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.Ke2 >>b6 8.Re1 h6 9.c4 Kf7 10.Ne4 >>2. +- (1.82): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >>8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Ra1 Kxg7 12.Qb2 Qe5 >>3. +- (2.62): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Rh6 4.Bd3 Rh4 5.0-0 Qa4 6.Qe2 Nd7 7.Nf5 >>Nc5 8.Ne7+ Kxg7 9.Bf5 Bd7 10.Bg5 f6 >>4. +- (2.64): 1...Nc6 2.bxc6 bxc6 3.Ng3 Rb8 4.Be2 Qb1 5.Qxb1 Rxb1 6.0-0 Rb3 >>7.Nh5 >> >>(, 26.08.2005) >> >>The evaluation of all these moves goes down at depth 18 >> >>New game, >>rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: >> >>1. ± (0.77): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.c4 h6 >>8.f4 exf4 9.Nh5+ Kf7 10.Nxf6 >>2. +- (1.89): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >>8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Kh1 a3 12.Ra1 h5 >>3. +- (2.93): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 h5 3.Be2 h4 4.0-0 hxg3 >>4. +- (3.13): 1...Nc6 2.Ng3 Nb4 3.cxb4 >> >>(, 26.08.2005) >> >>Itertion 18 still was not finished but 4...Re6 and 4...Nc6 already lost their >>place in the top 4. >> >>New game, >>rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: >> >>1. ± (0.77): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Bd7 3.Ng3 Rc8 4.Qb2 Qxb2 5.Bxb2 Kxg7 6.Bd3 f6 7.c4 h6 >>8.f4 exf4 9.Nh5+ Kf7 10.Nxf6 >>2. +- (1.89): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Nd7 6.0-0 Bf5 7.Bg5 Qa3 >>8.Nf6+ Nxf6 9.Bxf5 Qd6 10.c4 b6 11.Kh1 a3 12.Ra1 h5 >>3. +- (2.58): 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Kd1 Qb3+ 5.Qc2 Qxc4 6.Nd4 Qc5 7.Nf5 >>Nd7 8.Nh6+ Kxg7 9.Qf5 Qd5+ 10.Bd2 Qe6 11.Bd3 e4 12.Re1 >>4. +- (2.92): 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 Rc8 5.c4 e4 6.Bxe4 Qxg7 7.0-0 >>Re8 8.Bb2 Qh6 9.Qc3 f6 10.Nf5 Bxf5 >> >>(, 26.08.2005) >> >> >> >>Uri > >Iteration 18 was finished with no change > >Iteration 19 all moves drop in score but 1...a4 is improving. > >New game, >rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/pP2p3/2P5/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: > >1. ± (1.23): 1...d5 2.cxd5 Nd7 3.Ng3 Nb6 4.c4 Re7 5.Be2 f5 6.Nh5 Rf7 7.0-0 Qa4 >8.Qc3 >2. ± (1.39): 1...a4 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 a3 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Bf5 6.0-0 Nd7 7.Ng5 >3. +- (2.59): 1...d6 2.Kd2 Bf5 3.Qxf5 Qa2+ 4.Kd1 Qxc4 5.Ng3 Qb3+ 6.Qc2 Qd5+ >7.Qd2 Qb3+ 8.Ke1 Nd7 9.Nf5 Re6 10.Bd3 >4. +- (3.13): 1...Rd8 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Bg4 4.Bd3 Rc8 5.c4 e4 6.Bxe4 Qxg7 7.0-0 h5 >8.d6 h4 9.Bxb7 hxg3 10.Bxa8 gxh2+ 11.Kxh2 > >(, 26.08.2005) > > >Rd8 lost the 4th place for Re6 > > >4. +- (3.10): 1...Re6 2.Ng3 d5 3.cxd5 Re7 4.Bd3 > >(, 26.08.2005) > >Re6 lost the 4th place for Nc6 > >4. +- (2.86): 1...Nc6 2.Ng3 Nb4 3.cxb4 axb4 4.Be2 Ra2 5.Qd1 b3 6.Bg5 Re6 7.0-0 >Qxd1 8.Rxd1 Rg6 9.Bd2 d6 10.Ne4 > >(, 26.08.2005) > >I will not continue to depth 20 but give more analysis to 1...d5 2.cxd5 and >1...a4 2.Ng3 After 1...d5 2.cxd5 I get +1.60 for white in the best option at depth 19 and the plan of white is Ng3 and c4 New game, rnb1r1k1/1p3pPp/8/pP1Pp3/8/2P5/2Q1NPPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: 1. +- (1.60): 2...Nd7 3.Ng3 Nb6 4.c4 f5 5.Nh5 Kf7 6.Be2 Qa4 7.Qd3 Qa2 8.0-0 e4 9.Qd4 Qxe2 10.Nf6 Rg8 11.Nxg8 Kxg8 12.Qxb6 Qxc4 2. +- (1.97): 2...Re7 3.Ng3 Rc7 4.c4 e4 5.Be2 Re7 6.0-0 Qf6 7.Bb2 Qh6 8.Qc1 Qxc1 9.Rxc1 b6 10.c5 Re8 11.c6 3. +- (2.32): 2...b6 3.Ng3 Nd7 4.Bc4 Nc5 5.0-0 Qa4 6.Qe2 4. +- (2.39): 2...e4 3.Ng3 Nd7 4.Nh5 Re5 5.Be2 Nc5 6.0-0 Qa4 7.Nf6+ Kxg7 8.Qd2 (, 26.08.2005) After 1...a4 2.Ng3 it seems that d5 is best and not good for black New game, rnb1r1k1/1p1p1pPp/8/1P2p3/p1P5/2P3N1/2Q2PPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: 1. ± (1.39): 2...d5 3.cxd5 2. +- (2.53): 2...a3 3.Bd3 e4 4.Bxe4 d5 5.cxd5 f5 6.0-0 fxe4 7.Nxe4 Nd7 8.d6 a2 9.Qb3+ Kxg7 10.Bh6+ Kxh6 11.Rxa1 Rxe4 12.f3 Re5 13.c4 b6 14.Rxa2 Nc5 15.Qc3 Rxa2 16.Qxe5 3. +- (3.28): 2...d6 3.Bd3 e4 4.Nxe4 d5 5.0-0 dxe4 6.Bxe4 Re6 7.Bxh7+ Kxg7 8.c5 a3 9.Bh6+ Rxh6 10.Rxa1 Rxh7 11.c4 Nd7 12.Qf5 Kh8 13.Re1 Nb6 4. +- (3.62): 2...Nc6 3.Be2 (, 26.08.2005) After d5 cxd5 New game, rnb1r1k1/1p3pPp/8/1P1Pp3/p7/2P3N1/2Q2PPP/q1B1KB1R b K - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: 1. +- (2.53): 3...a3 2. +- (2.82): 3...Bg4 4.h3 Bd7 5.Nh5 Bf5 6.Nf6+ Kxg7 7.Nxe8+ Kf8 8.Qd2 Kxe8 9.Be2 Nd7 10.0-0 Rc8 11.Bb2 Qa2 12.c4 Qb3 3. +- (3.37): 3...Re7 4.Bd3 e4 5.Nxe4 Bf5 6.0-0 Nd7 7.Bf4 Qxf1+ 8.Kxf1 a3 9.Qa2 Bxe4 10.Bxe4 Rxe4 11.Bd6 Kxg7 12.f3 Re3 13.c4 b6 14.Kf2 4. +- (3.38): 3...e4 4.Bc4 Nd7 5.0-0 a3 6.Nxe4 Rxe4 7.Qxe4 Qxc3 8.Bh6 Qe5 9.Qxe5 Nxe5 10.Re1 Bg4 11.Rxe5 a2 12.Bxa2 Rxa2 (, 26.08.2005) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.