Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 01:53:58 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 04:44:33, Shaley wrote: >On August 26, 2005 at 04:22:01, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>From CSS Online: >> >>"Neue wissensbasierte und extrem spielstarke Schach-Engine: Fritz9". Hmm does >>this mean: loses to Fruit, but it's strong against humans?! >> >>Jouni >Hi Jouni, > >Looks like a lot of people over here are crazy about Fruit even w/o trying it >over other engines. Lol! Someone used to post, it seems, that an 11 games' >tourney cannot be a proof of the programme's strengths or weaknesses. Long-term >testing should be done. No-one really knows how strong the new Fritz version >really is. As is said, "let's wait and see", right? Friedel used to tell me the >new engine is simply packed with chess knowledge. It is only some while after >when we get a chance of feeling it that we can see what he can do in reality >with Fruit, Zappa and other silicon monsters. I remember Frans Morsch said in an >interview that from now on they would be working to make this engine play sound >chess; not good chess from the point of view of beating machines or sound chess >for beating humans. They will try to make Fritz play universally sound chess; it >may compete very successfully against the machines as a result, he said. But >their ambition is to make an engine that will play very good chess in general >terms. >Cheers, >Alexander than they should have not started to implement imperfect human knowledge about chess into the engine. As a result they get an engine which plays for weak humans sound chess but not from an objective point of view. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.