Author: Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso
Date: 12:27:51 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
>My first thought is that the number of "fail lows" is irrelevant. What you >really want to avoid is a reduction on a move that might fail high. Any move >will fail low in some situations, but you want to handle the "typical" case >correctly and not reduce if there is a reasonable chance the reduction will hide >something. So, you are saying history based pruning is not a safe thing to do? Or are you saying I should use tipical history values instead of counters? Alvaro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.