Author: rasjid chan
Date: 12:36:15 08/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2005 at 10:09:21, Jon Dart wrote: >> So this mean we don't need to keep pv[][] if we have hash tables (it is >> like double accounting). > >I think this is false, given you have a finite size hash table and must >eventually replace something. I have some experience: I used to retrieve pv from >the hash table but now use a pv array and back up the scores. > >--Jon They tell me so and I begin to doubt. Maybe as Dr Hyatt says, backup the pv. It may be best to be simple as I don't yet know how hashing twists and turns within. Rasjid
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.