Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Zappa endgame bug

Author: Chuck

Date: 18:26:42 08/27/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2005 at 12:36:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 24, 2005 at 11:59:58, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 24, 2005 at 11:14:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On August 24, 2005 at 03:05:25, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 24, 2005 at 01:23:26, Majd Al-Ansari wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>A human will immediately assess that black has a passed pawn on kingside so his
>>>>>own passed pawn on queenside cannot be supported by the king .... therefore an
>>>>>obvious draw without any calculation needed.
>>>>
>>>>I think that you overestimate humans.
>>>>I was not talking about the top humans but about the big majority of humans who
>>>>play in tournaments.
>>>>
>>>>Of course humans can see that black cannot support the passed pawns by the king
>>>>after some thinking but not immediately.
>>>
>>>Sorry, but I disagree here.  But then I have worked on this exact code in Crafty
>>>many times.  I don't even have to think about the king-side majority that
>>>becomes a passed pawn.  So when I saw the position, my only question was "can
>>>black do anything on the queenside without the king, because the king has to
>>>restrain white's passed pawn on the kingside.
>>>
>>>After looking for a few seconds, I thought "no".  So now it does become some
>>>calculation to see if either can win when both have passers on opposite wings.
>>>Since white's king is positioned OK, didn't take me much to come up with
>>>"draw"...
>>
>>I know that basically 2 pawns cannot win without the king but I also know
>>basically that with 2 pawn advantage in pawn endgame you can win and when you
>>have 2 passed pawns and the oponnent only has pawn majority it seems to me
>>thatit probably a win for the side with 2 passed pawns.
>>
>>Only after thinking about it I see that the king cannot support the pawns.
>>
>>pawn majority of 2 against 1 is not something that I am afraid of based on
>>experience and here is an example
>>
>>[D]8/8/pk4pp/8/PP5K/8/8/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>pawn majority does not help white and note that black has only one pawn
>>advantage and not 2 pawn advantage.
>>
>>Uri
>
>that isn't a pawn majority in my calculations.  The pawn can't advance to make a
>passed pawn, it is just a pawn liquidation that loses a pawn.
>
>Also, two connected passers against a single passer loses.  The king can't stop
>two connected passers.  The only calculation I have to do here is to answer the
>question "can one side produce two connected passers against the other side's
>single passer?"  If so, the two connected passers have to be stopped, losing the
>single passer and the game...
>
>I actually have code in Crafty to handle this specific case (a protected passer
>wins against an isolated passer if the king can catch the isolated passer)...


Just to find out what the best can see, I ran this all night on Shredder 9.
Here's the analysis (in short, Shredder 9.1 still sees a win for Black but
doesn't play the captures):

[d]8/2p2kp1/1p2p3/2p1p1PP/2P1P3/1r2BK2/4R3/3n4 b - -

Engine: Shredder 9 UCI (64 MB)
by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen

11/25  0:01   +3.19    1...c6 2.Re1 Rd3 3.Ke2 (165.299) 118

11/25  0:01   +3.20++  1...Rc3 (209.115) 142

11/25  0:01   +3.22    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.h6 Kg8
                       5.Ra3 gxh6 6.gxh6 Kh7 7.Ra7 (218.434) 145

12/21  0:01   +3.31    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.h6 Kg8
                       5.Rb3 Rd4 6.Ke3 Rd1 7.hxg7 Kxg7 (314.712) 184

13/26  0:02   +3.47    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Re1 Rc3+
                       5.Kg4 b5 6.h6 Kg8 7.Rd1 Re3 8.hxg7 Kxg7 (541.686) 253

14/28  0:02   +3.56    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra7 Rd7 6.h6 Kg6 (975.860) 330

15/38  0:04   +3.46    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxe3+ (1.789.773) 437

16/31  0:05   +3.46    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxe3+
                       4.Kxe3 (2.702.723) 492

17/38  0:07   +3.46    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxe3+
                       4.Kxe3 (3.998.171) 524

18/42  0:15   +3.45    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxe3+
                       4.Kxe3 (9.202.846) 596

18/42  0:21   +3.46++  1...Rd3 (12.672.241) 590 TB:3

18/42  0:21   +3.46    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Nxe3 (12.856.806) 589 TB:3

19/44  0:38   +3.42    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rc3
                       5.g6 (26.619.111) 691 TB:3

19/44  0:54   +3.43++  1...b5 (36.128.545) 657 TB:35

19/48  1:01   +3.43    1...b5 2.Re1 (39.764.864) 645 TB:64

20/50  1:18   +3.25    1...b5 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxe3+
                       4.Kxe3 b4 5.Kd3 Ke7 6.Kc2 Kf8 7.Kb2 Kf7
                       8.Kb3 Ke8 9.Kc2 (47.131.157) 600 TB:144

20/50  1:22   +3.26++  1...Rd3 (49.036.371) 594 TB:147

20/50  1:34   +3.42    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rc3
                       5.g6 Rxc4 6.Rf1 Rd4+ 7.Kc2 Rxe4 (56.599.039) 598 TB:147

21/48  2:14   +3.39    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.h6 gxh6 6.gxh6 Kf7 7.Kd2 Rxh6
                       8.Rg1 Ke7 9.Rg8 Kd6 10.Rd8+ Kc6 (78.804.151) 586 TB:187

21/48  2:34   +3.40++  1...Rc3 (90.368.175) 584 TB:278

21/48  3:16   +3.65    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra1 Rd8 6.Ke3 c4 7.h6 (110.199.757) 561 TB:399

22/47  4:03   +3.67    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra1 Rd8 6.Ke2 c4 7.Rf1+ (132.600.797) 544 TB:682

23/48  6:20   +3.69    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Re1 Rd4
                       5.Rh1 Rd3+ 6.Ke2 c4 7.h6 gxh6 8.gxh6 Kg8
                       9.Rh5 Kh7 10.Rxe5 Rd6 (196.041.654) 515
                       TB:2.034

24/49  9:31   +3.72    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra7 Rd7 6.Kg4 c4 7.Ra8 Ke7 (286.751.234) 502
                       TB:4.391

25/56  16:47  +3.50    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra7 Rd7 6.Ra4 Rd8 7.Ra7 (532.880.516) 528
                       TB:10.900

26/57  30:18  +3.75++  1...Rc3 2.Re1 (933.762.404) 513
                       TB:36.033

26/57  31:10  +3.75    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.Ra3 Rd4
                       5.Ra7 Rd7 6.Ra4 Ke7 7.Ra1 b5 8.Ra5 (957.971.410) 512
                       TB:36.854

27/60  40:20  +3.50--  1...Rc3 2.Re1 (1.242.014.625) 513
                       TB:53.061

27/60  56:10  +3.12    1...Rc3 2.Re1 Nxe3 3.Rxe3 Rxc4 4.g6+ Ke7
                       5.Re1 Rd4 6.Kg4 b5 7.h6 gxh6 8.Kh5 Kf8
                       9.Kxh6 Kg8 (1.920.157.540) 569
                       TB:74.260

27/60  60:18  +3.13++  1...Rd3 (2.036.798.326) 562
                       TB:80.728

27/62  72:18  +3.47    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.h6 gxh6 6.gxh6 Kf7 7.Kc2 Rxh6
                       8.Rg1 Ke7 (2.465.708.334) 568
                       TB:102.150

28/59  108:33 +3.62    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.g6 Rxh5 6.Ke2 Rg5 7.Rd1 (3.355.979.633) 515
                       TB:225.682

29/60  156:53 +3.63    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.g6 Rxh5 6.Ke2 Rg5 7.Rd1 Rxg6 8.Rd7 Kf8
                       9.Rxc7 Rg2+ 10.Kd3 Rg3+ (4.499.167.940) 477
                       TB:387.450

30/62  273:38 +3.80    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.h6 Rc3 6.Rh1 gxh6 7.gxh6 (6.899.900.505) 420
                       TB:1.054.328

31/67  468:37 +3.82    1...Rd3 2.Re1 Kg8 3.Ke2 Rxe3+ 4.Kxd1 Rh3
                       5.g6 Rxh5 6.Ke2 Rg5 7.Rd1 Rxg6 8.Rd7 Kf8
                       9.Rxc7 Rg2+ 10.Kd3 Rg3+ (10.657.745.565) 379
                       TB:2.293.137

best move: Rb3-d3 time: 810:07.282 min  n/s: 353.759  CPU 69.7%   n/s(1CPU):
507.545  nodes: 17.195.256.591 TB: 4.310.789



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.