Author: Günther Simon
Date: 02:02:04 08/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2005 at 17:36:42, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On August 28, 2005 at 16:51:07, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On August 28, 2005 at 13:56:32, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On August 28, 2005 at 13:47:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>> >>>Not the Multi or SMP version of Zappa that will be released commercially soon >>>:-) >>> >>> >> >>You got it wrong ... It is not because of SMP, Zappa version 2.0 >>is very different from 1.1, thus your header was still missleading. >> >>Guenther > >It was done intentionally, but Zappa version 2.0 on a single processor is not You still did not realize the facts, Zappa _was_ SMP since long >over 60 rating points more than Zappa 1.1. I did not know you have already version 2.0?? >PS: Time will tell when I get Zappa version 2.0; ah, suddenly time tells, but why do you tell something one line above _before_ time tells?? >but just like the commercial >version of Ruffian 1.05 and Rufian 2.10 there was NOT much difference. big nonsense pre assumption...what has Zappa to do with Ruffian?? >Therefore, the big difference is the smp capability of Zappa v2.0 which could >be around 60-100 rating depending on which SMP you will be using. Nonsense Zappa was SMP already in 1.0...just look at the hardware, which was used in CCT7 > >Pichard Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.