Author: paul bedrey
Date: 07:06:31 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2005 at 09:33:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 30, 2005 at 09:16:14, paul bedrey wrote: > >>On August 30, 2005 at 09:09:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On August 30, 2005 at 08:48:38, paul bedrey wrote: >>> >>>>On August 30, 2005 at 07:59:50, Shaley wrote: >>>> >>>>>Of course, the Hydra's hardware seems to be more powerful, so I think this match >>>>>will be a win for Hydra with some score advantage, may be 1-1.5 points. >>>> >>>>At least according to Walter Eigenmann latest list. After 512 games its rated at >>>>2864 and S9 at 2702. >>> >>>Where are those 512 games, no doubt played under valid conditions? >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>I believe all games can be downloaded from his site. Beware its a database of >>277,000 games. I too was wondering where they were played. Since people have >>mentioned playing Hydra online I assumed that the games were stored somewhere. > >Online play? So essentially this list is all different hardwares?? > >What a joke... > >-- >GCP Yes I think I read he uses games posted from many different sources which come from many different platforms and time controls although all are fairly long. I'd agree with your comment except that 1. it correlates well with the Vankempen list Uri quoted before and 2. most engines have played 1000's of games which could reduce the variability you are referring to. If you don't agree with the numbers the order seems logical. For instance Deep Sjeng 1.6 is quoted at 2558 elo with 2615 games played. If you add 50 points to all ratings the 2608 rating is very similar to the VanKempen rating list of 2594 using a more controled environment. Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.