Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 08:49:22 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2005 at 10:53:22, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: >On August 30, 2005 at 08:43:56, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On August 30, 2005 at 08:15:12, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: >> >>>- You mean index = (from,to) pair taken from the current move at the parent >>>node? >> >>Yes. >> >>>- In the 64x64 table do we store complete moves (as they come from the move >>>generator) or just the (from,to) information? >> >>Doesn't matter. Your choice. You can test with noting the piece type that moved >>and encforcing that, or not doing that. >> >>-- >>GCP > >One more thing, how do we age this entries? >Do we simply let the search overwrite the entries? Why would aging be needed??? I guess you could make a countermove1, countermove2 etc just like one does with killers, if you really want to... -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.