Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human Style or Lazy?

Author: Ray Rogers

Date: 14:27:01 08/30/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 30, 2005 at 17:11:54, Dan Andersson wrote:

>On August 30, 2005 at 16:40:55, Ray Rogers wrote:
>
>>Human Style or Lazy?
>>
>>This position occurred during a game in Margate in 2000.
>>
>>[D] 8/1p6/p1bk4/2R2Pp1/4p1P1/P3K3/1P5P/8 w - - 0 46
>>
>>White, a stronger player than I, went with Kd4 and of course black resigned but
>>only on move 57. I was watching and thought Rxc6 might produce instant
>>resignation! The next day I put this to my electronic friends, RISC 1mb and
>>Rebel 7 agreed in a few seconds whilst HIARCS 7.32, R30 (1995) and others liked
>>Kd4.
>>
>>Clearly RxB snuffs out any chance of black sticking a "cheapo" on him.
>>
>>Was I thinking like a human or just being lazy?
>
> A practical reasonable decision made by you. The move would probably break most
>opponents resistance. I would probably have played the 'showy' move f6 to
>demonstarte that all his pieces are wrong footed.
>
>MvH Dan Andersson

Hi there. I don't remember thinking of ANY other move here! Perhaps this
highlights a weakness in my play. I see a winning move and so I play it!

Cheers.
>>
>>I'm not a programmer but would be interested in the programmers' point of view.
>>
>>What would you WANT your program to play here?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Ray.
>>
>>ps. If you think you've seen this before Eric Hallsworth published my letter in
>>Selective Search No. 89.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.