Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;)

Author: A. Cozzie

Date: 16:04:05 08/30/05

Go up one level in this thread

On August 30, 2005 at 19:01:46, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On August 30, 2005 at 18:56:28, A. Cozzie wrote:
>
>>[D]8/1p6/p1bk4/2R2Pp1/4p1P1/P3K3/1P5P/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>1. Rc5xc6 Kd6xc6 2. Ke3xe4
>> = (9.18)	Depth: 3/5	00:00:00.00	0kN (104 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)
>>1. Rc5xc6 Kd6xc6 2. Ke3xe4 Kc6-d6 3. Ke4-d4 b7-b6 4. b2-b3 Kd6-e7 5. Kd4-e5
>>Ke7-f7 6. h2-h3 a6-a5 7. a3-a4 Kf7-g7 8. Ke5-e6 Kg7-h6 9. Ke6-d6
>> = (10.03)	Depth: 17/28	00:00:02.99	10680kN (3572 KN/s, 7692 splits, 549 aborts)
>
>Thanks for your answer, Anthony. But I don't understand it :-( I see depth 3
>above (with very impressive score).

It simply knows the KP ending is won in eval.  Nothing magical.  This isn't
really a very important test position, as white can win with practically any
move, but I wanted the engine to moves that human players would like ;)

anthony

• Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;) Kurt Utzinger 22:18:47 08/30/05
  • Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;) Uri Blass 23:03:57 08/30/05
    • Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;) Kurt Utzinger 23:09:40 08/30/05
      • Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;) Uri Blass 23:14:40 08/30/05
        • Re: 1 ply for Zappa 2.0 ;) Shaley 01:06:09 08/31/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.