Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:53:14 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2005 at 13:15:59, Joseph Tadeusz wrote: >On August 29, 2005 at 18:21:33, Peter Berger wrote: > > >>Hmm, let's go back to the imagined 17/27 from Spike. We need more games? >> >>OK. Let's look at this result: >> >>Wins: 12 >>Loss: 5 >>Draws: 100000 >> >>Better? Worse? No, the same. > >No, it only means their styles are boring, but the winner is still likely to be >better. > >Wins: 50012 >Loss: 50005 >Draws: 0 > >Wilder, but same result. That's *completely* wrong !!! It's great to have opinions on all kinds of things, but argueing maths only works when you can show some mistake in some proof. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.