Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:14:40 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2005 at 02:09:40, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 31, 2005 at 02:03:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 31, 2005 at 01:18:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On August 30, 2005 at 19:04:05, A. Cozzie wrote: >>> >>>[D]8/1p6/p1bk4/2R2Pp1/4p1P1/P3K3/1P5P/8 w - - 0 1 >>>>>> >>>>>>1. Rc5xc6 Kd6xc6 2. Ke3xe4 >>>>>> = (9.18) Depth: 3/5 00:00:00.00 0kN (104 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts) >>> >>>[...] but I wanted the engine to moves that human players would like ;) >>>> >>>>anthony >>> >>> Yes, we do like this behaviour, just great. >>> Kurt >> >>The problem is that it also knows by evaluation to play Rxe3+ in the following >>position inspite of the fact that the pawn endgame is drawn >> >>[D]8/2p2kp1/1p2p3/2p1p1PP/2P1P3/1r2BK2/4R3/3n4 b - - >> >>Uri > > Hi Uri > Interesting position I am going to check > with Zappa 1.1 in the evening (here 8.05 a.m now). > Kurt The position is taken from a game that was posted against zappa1.0 but I guess that 1.1 has the same problem because no improvement in pawn endgame was mentioned by anthony. see the following post http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?444681 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.