Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 12:05:53 08/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2005 at 10:18:36, Uri Blass wrote: I am actually not sure shredder is stronger at 4 processors than 1 or 2. How many events did shredder win at 4 processors? Shredders forward pruning seems too dubious when using 4 cpu's. Doesn't take away it's a very strong program. Please note i seem to remember that Zappa was 2900 rated at playchess for a while, why isn't it at the list? 2800 ain't much >On August 30, 2005 at 09:52:40, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On August 30, 2005 at 09:33:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On August 30, 2005 at 09:16:14, paul bedrey wrote: >>> >>>>On August 30, 2005 at 09:09:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 30, 2005 at 08:48:38, paul bedrey wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 30, 2005 at 07:59:50, Shaley wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Of course, the Hydra's hardware seems to be more powerful, so I think this match >>>>>>>will be a win for Hydra with some score advantage, may be 1-1.5 points. >>>>>> >>>>>>At least according to Walter Eigenmann latest list. After 512 games its rated at >>>>>>2864 and S9 at 2702. >>>>> >>>>>Where are those 512 games, no doubt played under valid conditions? >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>GCP >>>> >>>>I believe all games can be downloaded from his site. Beware its a database of >>>>277,000 games. I too was wondering where they were played. Since people have >>>>mentioned playing Hydra online I assumed that the games were stored somewhere. >>> >>>Online play? So essentially this list is all different hardwares?? >>> >>>What a joke... >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >> >>but a good one. It seems to reflect the overall playing strength rather well. >> >>regards Joachim > >No > >I guess that Deep Shredder9 on 4 processors is significantly stronger than >Shredder9 on the same machine but the list does not reflect it. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.