Author: Günther Simon
Date: 06:17:55 09/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2005 at 08:54:35, Madhavan wrote: >On September 02, 2005 at 08:23:00, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On September 02, 2005 at 07:16:57, Volker Böhm wrote: >> > >> >>[D]rn1qkbnr/pp3ppp/2p1p3/3p1b2/2PP4/1QN2N2/PP2PPPP/R1B1KB1R b KQkq - 0 5 >>game 39 -> 5...Qc7?? (horrible for computers) > >horrible for computers? >are you suggesting b6 or qb6 are good moves? > >I don't find Qc7 horrible for computers,show the eval of any decent engine to >prove that that move is horrible for computers? > >>Guenther It is, believe it or not.(evals won't help you, especially as the book line went on for further 10-12 moves, just look it up yourself. The whole line is much too passive for computers) Of course I expected that you did not talk about the other positions ;-) G.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.