Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 12:42:21 09/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2005 at 15:20:20, Karl-Heinz Söntges wrote: > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 >1 Thinker v4.7a 2531 +61 * 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 8.5/12 >2 Spike 1.0a Mainz xxxx 0 * ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 8.0/12 >3 Naum 1.8 2595 -103 0 ½ * ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 1 7.0/12 40.00 >4 Zappa 1.1 xxxx ½ ½ ½ * ½ 0 0 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 7.0/12 37.75 >5 WildCat v5.0 2540 -73 ½ 1 0 ½ * 0 1 ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 1 6.5/12 37.50 >6 Crafty v20.0 PS 2535 -67 0 ½ 0 1 1 * ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 6.5/12 34.75 >7 Crafty v20.0 DC xxxx 0 0 ½ 1 0 ½ * ½ 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 6.5/12 34.75 >8 Crafty 19.04 Lasker 2541 -103 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ * 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 6.0/12 >9 Pseudo v0.7c 2577 -171 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 0 1 * ½ ½ 1 ½ 5.5/12 31.00 >10 Scorpio v1.5 2568 -161 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ 1 5.5/12 30.75 >11 Crafty v19.20 DC 2556 -178 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1 * 1 0 5.0/12 >12 Crafty v20.0 BH xxxx ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 * ½ 3.5/12 >13 Glaurung Mainz 2550 -344 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 ½ * 2.5/12 > >Average elo: 2445 <=> Category: 8 >gm = 8.76 m = 6.36 > > > > > > >Craftymatch 2005 > > 12345678901234567890 >1 Crafty v20.0 PS 2534 ½11½½1½½½½½½1½0½½½½½ 11.5/20 >2 Crafty v20.0 DC 2555 ½00½½0½½½½½½0½1½½½½½ 8.5/20 > > Don't have all Crafty v20.0 versions (DC,PS,BH) identical sources? If yes, then these results only prove how small number of games can be misleading in estimating playing strengths. Especially bad results of Crafty 20.0 BH suprise me, because AFAIK BH's compiles are the fastest around. Robert
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.