Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:53:08 09/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
that is quite right, but Eduard is NOT called for to give a scientifically balanced presentation of Zappa. Please try to understand what Ed is doing. He shows facts that contradict the general trend. Remember (or read it in the archives how Ed showed crazy weaknesses of for example FRITZ who's always said to be state of the art - and Ed proved that this couldn't be the case if --- well, see the examples for yourself) what Eduard is doing: to prove a generally accepted truth as wrong you don't need a deep study but it is sufficient if you give just some contradicting examples - here that Zappa can also lose games. This isn't directly contradicting the results of the last WCCC because the games on playchess have a different setting in many aspects than that of the WCCCC. But at least the losses contradict the here published "truths" that Zappa doesn't lose. - Fact is it DOES. And thanks to Eduard we all know it right now. (What is wrong with what Eduard is doing in your opinion?) Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.