Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Muti processors, ok,then to be fair muli GMs in future matches

Author: Carey

Date: 13:08:57 09/03/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 03, 2005 at 15:15:58, Uri Blass wrote:

>Humans do not have to think for themselves in opening position and they can >play
>moves that they remember.

Generally speaking, even the best player will have an opening 'library'
substanially less than even a relatively simple program will have.

Additionaly, players usually don't do this by rote memorization.  They play over
it (using books etc. as guides) and they learn how to play it and whether their
style fits the required type of play.  They study it.  They learn *how* to play
it.

So when they do play an opening, it's generally based on what they've learned.
Not by what they've memorized.

That's not the same type of thing that most chess programs do with an opening
'book'.  In that case, it's just rote memorization.  For a human, that'd be
comparable to consulting an actual physical opening book.  Perhaps a few notes
in the margin about various aspects.  But that would still be just data
retrieval.  Not playing chess.


>Huamns also do not need to think for themselves in endgames and if they >remember
>the right move they are allowed to use their memory

How is *learning* general endgame rules at all comparable to a program using a
precomputed 6 piece endgame tablebase?

One is learned and the other is just rote memorization / data retrieval
containing no chess what so ever.



>I do not think for myself in KP vs K when I play Ke5 and I simply remember that
>this move is winning so I think that programs also should be allowed to do the
>same

In limited situations, limited amounts of knowledge can be 'memorized'.

But that just isn't the same as a program that uses large piece endgame
databases.

Knowing how to play an endgame is different from simply accessing some
precomputed database that tells you the answer.



I wasn't trying to get into a large conversation about the differences between
computers and humans , etc.  I was simply telling him that if he was proposing
parallel GM's, then other things were relevant too.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.