Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 14:16:46 09/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
Eduard isn't good in English but perhaps this here is convincing you: Eduard is known and famous for posting such critical chess messages to give the author of programs the chance to see where their baby is still weak. Sometimes the authors are happy, sometimes they say that these weaknesses are not interesting enough. Know what I mean? Eduard is posting from the chess side and it's up to the authors to qualify Ed's messages. I saw Ed address and call for Frans Morsch of FRITZ, I saw him addressing SMK from SHREDDER. I could NEVER read that one of those wrote something bad against Eduard. What I want to mention is this: all this accusing of Eduard is simply far off the point of what he's doing. In a way he's doing some good work, but the authors can't be happy of course if such weaknesses of their babies are published worldwide. Finally I have a science argument. What you are fearing is this: if Eduard is posting such negative results the theory that Zappa is the overall best program without weaknesses could get injuries. But who did EVER assume such a nonsense? But if nobody has pretended such a nonsense, what is the dangerous side of the messages of Eduard?? - See? Peace? ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.