Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 18:36:15 02/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 1999 at 14:48:30, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On February 27, 1999 at 11:46:11, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On February 26, 1999 at 22:09:32, Peter McKenzie wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 1999 at 13:16:01, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>It is clear to me since several years that being a good chess player is a >>>>serious handicap for anybody trying to write a top level chess program. >>>> >>>>Every rule has its exceptions, so I guess you can find some. But can you list >>>>strong chess players that wrote good chess programs? I'm not even sure Larry >>>>Kaufman can be included in the list, because he does not program. >>> >>>Interesting theory, of course Hans Berliner is the obvious exception to it. >> >>Are you sure? Hitech was a nice program, but it was a long time ago. How would >>Berliner's program compare to current strong programs? > >Pretty well, I'd imagine. > >> Christophe > >Dave Gomboc I'm still not sure. Last time (to my knowledge) Hitech played in the World Championship, it was in May 95 in Honk Hong, on a fast supercomputer. It finished in the 6th place. Ranking of the first places were: 1. Fritz (4/5, 5/6) 2. Star Socrates (4/5, 4/6) 3. Deep Blue, Frenchess, Junior (3.5/5) 6. Rebel, Genius, WChess, Zugzwang, Hitech (3/5) 11. Cheiron, Virtua Chess, Schach 3 (2.5/5) ... Several microprocessor based programs (on P90 and P120 I think) did better or as well as Hitech which was computing 120000 positions per second. The micros were far from this (except Fritz maybe, but with a much simpler evaluation). I think Hitech could be overplayed by current programs/processor combinations, unless they have improved their hardware. BTW, does anybody know if Berliner is still working on his chess program? Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.