Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 03:17:36 09/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2005 at 05:37:48, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>Too many people like to use long GM's Openings for computer programs, but there
>is a drawback to this approach. Todays computer programs has reached a level of
>play that is higher than some of the best GM players. In order to avoid this
>from happening, most Opening Expert like Necchi and Harry Schapp to name a few
>will have to consider checking each opening where the two GM left as an even
>game with the top programs to analyse up to at least 6 more moves and only if
>after those 6 moves if the opening is still consider even, then the opening
>could be included with the rest of its opening library. We should be very
>carefull not to feed long Opening line above 12 moves from GMs. Please take a
>look a this game, and how many other bad human openings are still there in some
>of the best programs that we constanstly pit or match, favouring one side or the
>other. Here is a famous game where two of our best computer monsters were using
>the exact bad opening fed drectly from a game of two GMs:
>
>http://wired-vig.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,68243,00.html
Hi Jorge
What you describe above is indeed a problem and therefore
the Hydra team did the right thing to produce a (good)
book usually ending at move 10. Below the direct link
to the game you wanted to show:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1316427
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.