Author: Marc-Olivier Moisan-Plante
Date: 03:37:52 09/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2005 at 06:17:36, Kurt Utzinger wrote: Sorry Kurt, I did see your message before posting mine, Marc-Olivier >On September 04, 2005 at 05:37:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Too many people like to use long GM's Openings for computer programs, but there >>is a drawback to this approach. Todays computer programs has reached a level of >>play that is higher than some of the best GM players. In order to avoid this >>from happening, most Opening Expert like Necchi and Harry Schapp to name a few >>will have to consider checking each opening where the two GM left as an even >>game with the top programs to analyse up to at least 6 more moves and only if >>after those 6 moves if the opening is still consider even, then the opening >>could be included with the rest of its opening library. We should be very >>carefull not to feed long Opening line above 12 moves from GMs. Please take a >>look a this game, and how many other bad human openings are still there in some >>of the best programs that we constanstly pit or match, favouring one side or the >>other. Here is a famous game where two of our best computer monsters were using >>the exact bad opening fed drectly from a game of two GMs: >> >>http://wired-vig.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,68243,00.html > > > Hi Jorge > What you describe above is indeed a problem and therefore > the Hydra team did the right thing to produce a (good) > book usually ending at move 10. Below the direct link > to the game you wanted to show: > http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1316427 > Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.