Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 19:13:08 02/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 1999 at 21:49:27, john c cook wrote: >THE END GAME IS A LOT BETTER I ALLWAY BELIVE THE END GAME OF REBEL10 WAS >WEAK POINT OF REBEL10 BUT NOW IT LOOK A LOT BETTER THIS WAS HOW COME REBEL10 WAS >NOT ON TOP FOR COMPUTER VS COMPUTER GAME >I NOW BELIVE IT WILL BE ON TOP HIARCS7.1 IS THE PROGRAM TO BEAT BECAUSE >IT END GAME WAS BETTER THAN THE OTHER >FRITZ5.32 I BELIVE HAS A VERY BAD END GAME IT IS THE WORST OF TOP 10 >I HAVE SEND IT PLAY SO MANY ENDGAME THAT WERE DRAW AND IT WOULD LOOSE >THE GAME RIGHT NOW I BELIVE > >HIARCS7.1 IS NUMBER 1 >REBEL10.C 2 >FRITZ5.32 3 >I WILL HAVE TO PLAY MORE GAMES REBEL10 VS HAIRCS7.1 >TO SAY THE PROGRAM ARE NOT GM I DO NOT KNOW HOW THEY CAN SAY THIS I do not know how you can say that its endgame is better in such a short period of time after its release, you say this after how many games, I would assume at 40/2 time control you would have barely had time to get one game in. It does seem to search faster but as for the rest I have yet to see any change in it play, due to that I have not had time to test or see this. You comments are a bit premature I think, time will tell. Plus it will be interesting to see how this updated engine plays without its opening book and see if it is better than its previous version. note : do not use capitals, its slightly annoying to read.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.