Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Will Zappa go the same way as Pirat/YChess GUI's ?

Author: Michael Diosi

Date: 10:44:02 09/05/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2005 at 13:31:58, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On September 05, 2005 at 13:21:18, Michael Diosi wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Some of you might already know about this engines and the GUI's:
>>
>>http://www.ychess.com/
>>http://www.go-pirat.de/
>>
>>
>>YChess is an engine which has been around for a very long time already and it
>>was rtaher good, pitty that it isn't UCI itself, why ?
>>
>>Pirat, would be nice to have this as UCI. The GUI itself is for correspondence
>>players but it supports UCI so why not making the engine UCI also ?
>>
>>Did anyone buy those and why or why not ?
>>
>>Michael
>
>
>IMO the people WOULD buy ychess or pirat if it would have won a championship.
>and - they did not.

Championships do not have the importance they used to have in the times when we
had 9-10 chess programs worldwide. It is nice to go to Tel Aviv, Iceland,
Torino, see the cities and listen to the conferences about what is new in the
computer chess field. I wouldn't buy a product just because it won a
worldchampionship.



>zappa won with a big advantage. IMO therefore people get attention and will buy
>it.

Not me if it is not UCI/Winboard and meet some other criteria also.

>would you buy an engine that did not win in a competition ?

Yes, I would buy them but they already fail on the first criterium. They are not
UCI/Winboard.

Michael



This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.