Author: Roman Hartmann
Date: 08:05:46 09/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2005 at 10:55:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 06, 2005 at 10:46:11, Roman Hartmann wrote: > >>On September 06, 2005 at 10:16:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On September 06, 2005 at 08:43:09, Roman Hartmann wrote: >>> >>>>On September 06, 2005 at 08:35:08, Rafael Vasquez wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 06, 2005 at 04:09:23, Steve Maughan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Ed, >>>>>> >>>>>>>What about pirating? >>>>>> >>>>>>Note that the UCI protocol does allow the author to invoke copy protection. >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>>Steve >>>>>This is not True >>>>> >>>>>Shredder9 UCI DOES invoke copy protection. >>>> >>>>That's what Steve already stated. I remember there was some kind of >>>>copyprotection coming along with Ruffian 2.X as well. So copyprotection isn't an >>>>issue to leave UCI out obviously. >>> >>>Yeah, this kind of copyprotection works "really well"... >>> >>>Chess - Deep Sjeng 1.6 (UCI-WB) Cracked.rar >>>Chess - Ruffian 2.0.2 (UCI-WB) Cracked.rar >>>Chess - Ruffian 2.1.0 (UCI-WB) Cracked.rar >>>Shredder 8 UCI_works in CB GUI.zip >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>But that's not the fault of UCI. That only means that the copyprotection is too >>easy to crack. > >There exist no such thing as a non-crackable copyprotection, and the people who >do these things probably consider it a challenge, so trying to make it better is >just a completly lost cause and waste of time. >A cracked 700M CD is still harder to transfer than a cracked 1M engine. Yes, there is no doubt about that. Still SMK is selling Shredder online as well without a heavy copy protection. After all, a lot of people who are using stolen software never even considered to buy it, so I don't know how much it hurts the sales really. Roman >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.