Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 10:31:26 09/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2005 at 13:09:59, Richard Sutherland wrote: >I don't want to get drawn into the enormously long Zappa gui debate, but I was >wondering why Zappa, Diep, Sjeng and even Fritz for that matter, cant implement >as Shredder did in it's latest incarnation? That is, produce your own GUI, which >is the absolute strongest version, complete with auto232 No programmer should be compelled to write to a garbage interface like auto232. >support, and then also >release a UCI The same goes for the "bad and wrong" UCI interface. http://jargon.watson-net.com/jargon.asp?w=Bad+and+Wrong >version with the disclaimber that it might not be as strong as the >GUI version, if run under another GUI. Don't hobble the UCI version, just >release it as an optional program with the new GUI version and the disclaimer. >That way, everybody is happy and people like me, who enjoy playing mini >tournaments under the CB interface, and also enjoy playing two enhines against >each other on different PC's, can have the best of both worlds!!!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.