Author: Norm Pollock
Date: 06:03:12 09/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2005 at 08:19:22, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>On September 07, 2005 at 07:30:09, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>I come to think I will probably buy it just to see, if it really is among the
>>>best chess engines as its author claims.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Zappa may not support UCI. That means the author does not want extensive
>>comparason of playing strength. We are to believe his claims by faith.
>
>You can load other UCI engines into Zappa's interface, and test the strength
>that way.
>
>Your argument is completely bogus.
>
>--
>GCP
GCP-
The argument for having UCI support on the Zappa engine is clear. It is to
enhance the product's entertainment value for many potential customers such as
myself.
I expect you will use the same ("bogus") or other condescending remark, to
insult those who disagree with you and who wish to engage in constructive
discussion. But that just shows how shallow your argument is.
-Norm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.