Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:36:14 03/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 1999 at 11:30:53, Larry Griffiths wrote: >On February 28, 1999 at 00:30:20, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>On February 26, 1999 at 20:28:44, Larry Griffiths wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 1999 at 20:01:12, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>> >>>>The new GNU Chess takes about 2 1/4 minutes on a non-dedicated >>>>SUN Enterprise-class machine. Includes the usual full leaf >>>>evaluation (since exclusive pc/sq tables have been largely >>>>discredited as well as the usual lazy eval.) >>>> >>>>I don't see what point this test has since whoever can throw >>>>the most iron at it "wins". >>>> >>>>GNU 5.0 Chess Program >>>>Version 5.00d (17 Dec 1998) >>>> >>>>Transposition table: Entries=256K Size=8192K >>>>Pawn hash table: Entries=32K Size=2048K >>>>White (1) : post >>>>White (1) : force >>>>White (1) : e4 >>>>1. e4 >>>> >>>>black KQkq e3 >>>>r n b q k b n r >>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>> >>>>Black (1) : depth 10 >>>>Black (1) : go >>>>Root score = -30 Phase = 0 Depth = 10 >>>> no book. >>>> 1. 0 0 24 d5 >>>> 2& -25 0 97 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>> 2. -25 1 144 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>> 3& -28 1 495 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 >>>> 3& 0 2 867 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>> 3. 0 4 1654 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>> 4& -24 5 2265 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>> 4. -24 7 4145 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>> 5& 0 13 8311 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>> 5. 0 18 11087 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>> 6& -16 38 24524 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>> 6. -16 59 41123 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>> 7& -1 149 105799 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe4 Qf3 Nf6 >>>> 7& 0 224 159010 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>> 7. 0 282 196049 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>> 8& -20 492 347056 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>> 8. -20 799 574902 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>> 9& -10 1266 901912 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>> 9. -10 2430 1753901 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>>10& -26 4386 3127413 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bb5 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d3 Ng4 O-O >>>>10& -14 10337 7390952 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 dxe5 >>>>10. -14 13640 9769398 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 >>>>Time = 136.4 Rate=71623 Nodes=[8776563/992835/9769398] GenCnt=11519786 >>>>Eval=[1138817/4174540] RptCnt=915 NullCut=338736 FutlCut=757941 >>>>Ext: Chk=230000 Recap=86348 Pawn=18800 OneRep=16654 Horz=5813 Thrt=0 >>>>Material=[3600/3600 : 4400/4400] Worst=[-92/-104] >>>>Hash: Success=10% Collision=82% Pawn=63% >>>> >>>>white KQkq >>>>r n b q k b . r >>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>. . . . . n . . >>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>> >>>> >>>>My move is : Nf6 >>> >>>Stuart, >>> >>>I wanted to know how my program stands at this time compared with other >>>programs. I see now that I still have a lot of work to do to improve >>>the performance of my program. I ask my self "What makes these other >>>programs run so fast". I have asked more questions here and have found >>>some great things to try. >>> >>>Thanks for your response. >>> >>>Larry :-0 >> >>Don't sell yourself short. What hardware are you running on and what >>is your result for the same 10-ply post 1. e4 search? > > >It took 22 minutes to 10 plys on a pentium 350. > >Larry. Wow! I didn't realize a Pentium 350mhz was that slow compared to a mid-range Ultra-Sparc. Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.