Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 10:56:34 03/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 1999 at 13:36:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On February 28, 1999 at 11:30:53, Larry Griffiths wrote: > >>On February 28, 1999 at 00:30:20, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 1999 at 20:28:44, Larry Griffiths wrote: >>> >>>>On February 26, 1999 at 20:01:12, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>>> >>>>>The new GNU Chess takes about 2 1/4 minutes on a non-dedicated >>>>>SUN Enterprise-class machine. Includes the usual full leaf >>>>>evaluation (since exclusive pc/sq tables have been largely >>>>>discredited as well as the usual lazy eval.) >>>>> >>>>>I don't see what point this test has since whoever can throw >>>>>the most iron at it "wins". >>>>> >>>>>GNU 5.0 Chess Program >>>>>Version 5.00d (17 Dec 1998) >>>>> >>>>>Transposition table: Entries=256K Size=8192K >>>>>Pawn hash table: Entries=32K Size=2048K >>>>>White (1) : post >>>>>White (1) : force >>>>>White (1) : e4 >>>>>1. e4 >>>>> >>>>>black KQkq e3 >>>>>r n b q k b n r >>>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>>> >>>>>Black (1) : depth 10 >>>>>Black (1) : go >>>>>Root score = -30 Phase = 0 Depth = 10 >>>>> no book. >>>>> 1. 0 0 24 d5 >>>>> 2& -25 0 97 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>>> 2. -25 1 144 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 >>>>> 3& -28 1 495 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 >>>>> 3& 0 2 867 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>>> 3. 0 4 1654 e5 Nc3 Nc6 >>>>> 4& -24 5 2265 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>>> 4. -24 7 4145 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 >>>>> 5& 0 13 8311 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>>> 5. 0 18 11087 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 >>>>> 6& -16 38 24524 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>>> 6. -16 59 41123 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 Bxe5 dxe5 Nxe4 >>>>> 7& -1 149 105799 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe4 Qf3 Nf6 >>>>> 7& 0 224 159010 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>>> 7. 0 282 196049 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Be2 Bb4 >>>>> 8& -20 492 347056 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>>> 8. -20 799 574902 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 e5 Ne4 Bb5 >>>>> 9& -10 1266 901912 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>>> 9. -10 2430 1753901 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 d4 d5 h3 Nh6 >>>>>10& -26 4386 3127413 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bb5 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d3 Ng4 O-O >>>>>10& -14 10337 7390952 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 dxe5 >>>>>10. -14 13640 9769398 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 c5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4 dxe5 >>>>>Time = 136.4 Rate=71623 Nodes=[8776563/992835/9769398] GenCnt=11519786 >>>>>Eval=[1138817/4174540] RptCnt=915 NullCut=338736 FutlCut=757941 >>>>>Ext: Chk=230000 Recap=86348 Pawn=18800 OneRep=16654 Horz=5813 Thrt=0 >>>>>Material=[3600/3600 : 4400/4400] Worst=[-92/-104] >>>>>Hash: Success=10% Collision=82% Pawn=63% >>>>> >>>>>white KQkq >>>>>r n b q k b . r >>>>>p p p p p p p p >>>>>. . . . . n . . >>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>. . . . P . . . >>>>>. . . . . . . . >>>>>P P P P . P P P >>>>>R N B Q K B N R >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>My move is : Nf6 >>>> >>>>Stuart, >>>> >>>>I wanted to know how my program stands at this time compared with other >>>>programs. I see now that I still have a lot of work to do to improve >>>>the performance of my program. I ask my self "What makes these other >>>>programs run so fast". I have asked more questions here and have found >>>>some great things to try. >>>> >>>>Thanks for your response. >>>> >>>>Larry :-0 >>> >>>Don't sell yourself short. What hardware are you running on and what >>>is your result for the same 10-ply post 1. e4 search? >> >> >>It took 22 minutes to 10 plys on a pentium 350. >> >>Larry. > >Wow! I didn't realize a Pentium 350mhz was that slow compared to a >mid-range Ultra-Sparc. > >Stuart Something must be wrong here. PII/350 cannot be 4 times slower than *any* Sparc. Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.