Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: A useful programme from a correspondence player's point of view

Author: Alex Shalamanov

Date: 00:06:13 09/08/05


There's been a lot of contradicting views about what a programme's GUI and a
chess engine should be to arouse commercial success with the public. Since
correspondence players are likely to be the major customers of chess playing
programmes compared to the other groups (OTB GM, IM or FM as well as chess
amateurs, children, etc.), I'm going to state what CC players seek finding in
chess programmes.

1. A strong analytic tool as a chess engine capable of sound positional
evaluation and making good long-term middlegame and endgame plans as well as
sophisticated embedded endgame knowledge.
2. A triple brain feature like one used under Shredder Classic GUI when two or
more chess engines work in parallel and the third engine compares the output
produced and chooses the most optimal. However, the engines should be super
strong but have a different style and evaluation approach like, say, Shredder 9
and Fruit 2.1 or Spike 1.0.
3. A huge commented or plain text game database to be replenished regularly.
4. A good tool for commenting one's finished games with extended text comments
as in Fritz versions.
5. A good and convenient-looking 2D chess set. As a rule, correspondence players
are very pessimistic about 3D chess sets because they use programmes mostly to
analyse positions and the 2D format would be most approprate for analysis
purposes.
6. A tool for generating email chess messages or a webchess tool integrated like
in ECTool, because correspondence players participate in various email or
webchess tournaments apart from regular snailmail chess tournaments.
7. A playchess server connection to play online chess, because many CC players
are also strong OTB players and like blitz games for pleasure.

It's understandable that it's not an easy job to take all this into account in
developing a single software product; however, the first 5 are ones to be of
utter importance for CC players. And, please, don't kick me, those were just my
personal requirements for the chess programme, so take them as just one personal
subjective demands as an ordinary ICCF member. Uri Blass or other strong CC
players would obviously have a different view about them.

Regards,
Alex



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.