Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 06:55:48 09/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2005 at 04:06:17, Alex Shalamanov wrote: >I use Shredder 9 Classic to analyse my games. I've also found out that when I >use Fruit 2.1 in parallel with Shredder 9 Sandro Necci (I named it that way >because I used in it the settings Sandro proposed on the forum) under Triple >Brain Analysis both the output and the evaluation are likely more sensible. I >don't know why but SMK made recent Shredder version more aggressive and less >positionally cautious; it leads to interesting but very unstable games. It's >okay for OTB or engine-engine games but in correspondence chess this approach is >very vulnerable. The Columbus' egg setting (renamed by you Shredder 9 Sandro Necchi) is made by me and not by SMK. The aim of the setting was to have a more aggressive Shredder, willing to take more risks to create more complicated games. >Very often Shredder's evaluation is too optimistic. However, >Fruit with its cautious and accurate positional style 'cools Shredder off'. What hardware and levels are you using? My tests do show the opposite: Columbus' egg (+ S10 book) - Fruit 2.1 (+ ASV3.ctg) = 36.5 - 22.5 (59; +27 =19 -13) 61.8 TP = +84 Fruit 2.1 lost also using Shredder 9 book running in Shredder classic interface... I hoped to get some results also from people here, but the setting "seems lost in the Atlantic Ocean"...:-) >If there was a commercially available version of Fruit WCCC, I'd surely buy it >for its good solid and well-grounded positional style. But there's been no >information in favour of it. What do you think is going to be released sooner: >Shredder 10 or Fruit WCCC, if any? It's a pity the developers are so reticent. >Alex Shredder 10 will be quite different as this is only a different setting, while Shredder 10 will be a new program (updated program). Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.