Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:22:06 09/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
Peter, I understood what is your driving motivation. Please try to understand mine. Your logic is flawed. I don't doubt you the right to have opinions, but I insist if you come to wrong conclusions and then on this base you are trying to spread judgements about the meaning of other people's messages. Gian-Carlo was posting insults. Anthony did whine about a "flamewar" which didn't exist and Vincent's arrogance gave it the final taste. - Normally it is so in debates that your opinion is the same value as another opinion. No problem with that. But here you came after a longer debate and wanted to make your conclusions. And they were wrong. But how could I prove them wrong? Couldn't you say that you still didn't agree. Yes, that's exactly what happened here. And this is why I came with a new argument about the age AND the experience of Djordje and myself. And now you are kept in a trap. Because you cannot claim that your opinions were correct without further facts (other than married and divorced and 2 kids) ans we two Dojordje and me we are wrong because out facts are nothing worth. Our education, age and experience. You update to 31 is of no value because I am still 30 years older than you. What have you done in your life other than holding chess tournaments, Peter? We are NOT debating about chess here but about insults. - Everything ok now?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.