Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 09:44:16 09/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2005 at 12:22:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Peter, >I understood what is your driving motivation. Please try to understand mine. >Your logic is flawed. I don't doubt you the right to have opinions, but I insist >if you come to wrong conclusions and then on this base you are trying to spread >judgements about the meaning of other people's messages. Gian-Carlo was posting >insults. Anthony did whine about a "flamewar" which didn't exist and Vincent's >arrogance gave it the final taste. - Normally it is so in debates that your >opinion is the same value as another opinion. No problem with that. But here you >came after a longer debate and wanted to make your conclusions. And they were >wrong. But how could I prove them wrong? Couldn't you say that you still didn't >agree. Yes, that's exactly what happened here. And this is why I came with a new >argument about the age AND the experience of Djordje and myself. And now you are >kept in a trap. Because you cannot claim that your opinions were correct without >further facts (other than married and divorced and 2 kids) ans we two Dojordje >and me we are wrong because out facts are nothing worth. Our education, age and >experience. You update to 31 is of no value because I am still 30 years older >than you. What have you done in your life other than holding chess tournaments, >Peter? We are NOT debating about chess here but about insults. - Everything ok >now? This is easy to settle. You were insulted by what GCP/Anthony/Vincent has to say. I wasn't. Let's just agree to disagree and move on. This is going no where. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.