Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 11:07:05 09/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2005 at 13:30:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 09, 2005 at 12:25:31, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On September 09, 2005 at 11:40:10, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On September 09, 2005 at 09:55:48, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>The Columbus' egg setting (renamed by you Shredder 9 Sandro Necchi) is made by >>>>me and not by SMK. The aim of the setting was to have a more aggressive >>>>Shredder, willing to take more risks to create more complicated games. >>> >>>>I hoped to get some results also from people here, but the setting "seems lost >>>>in the Atlantic Ocean"...:-) >>>>Sandro >>> >>> >>> Hi Sandro >>> It's always the same: almost nobody has the time or >>> takes the time for serious and long testing an engine >>> or a specific settting. You know: many hundred games >>> at different time controls are needed and many people >>> owing "only" a single PC can't (I understand this) afford >>> the time needed to do such long lasting things. >>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>You are correct and I know how many games are needed, but I am "born in 2 >>months"...have a tendency to speed up everything...everytime... >> >>I hope you are running such test anyway. >> >>Ciao >>Sandro > > Hi Sandro > I must disappoint you in so far as I have not > run such test. For me Shredder 9 UCI is still > the strongest engine with default settings and > I can simply not imagine that things could even > become better with a more aggressive style. Of > course may I be wrong but at the moment I do not > have enough time to run a test with your setting. > Best regards > Kurt Hi Kurt, no problems. I thought the same until recently, otherwise I would have made the setting before. My tests so far indicates this setting is overall an improvement. Ciao Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.