Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: NBA and Computer Chess

Author: Michael Yee

Date: 12:56:01 09/11/05

Go up one level in this thread


On September 11, 2005 at 08:26:54, Vasik Rajlich wrote:

>On September 10, 2005 at 20:40:46, Michael Yee wrote:
>
>>On September 10, 2005 at 10:07:20, vladan wrote:
>>
>>>...
>>>-	SSDF  - analogue to NBA regular season,
>>>-	WCCC  - analogue to NBA playoff.
>>>...
>>
>>Hi Vladan,
>>
>>I like your analogy (partly because I like both computer chess and the NBA :).
>>
>>Here's something else to think about: NFL football has only about 16 games per
>>team for the whole regular season and then Super Bowl is just one game! Talk
>>about a small sample size... :)
>>
>>Michael
>
>Actually, the NFL playoffs are fairer than any other sport. (IMHO) The reason is
>that a football game gives you a better chance to assert your superiority. NBA
>playoffs also tend to be pretty fair - each game has more luck, but the
>best-of-7 format compensates. How many NFL or NBA champion teams were not really
>deserving? In contrast, baseball and hockey have way more upsets despite
>best-of-7 in the playoffs - it's much easier in those sports to lose to someone
>weaker. Even the top baseball team won't win two-thirds of its games.
>
>BTW - unfortunately this will never work for CC. It only works for humans
>because we have natural peaks & lows. You just can't have playoff intensity
>through 80+ games, or treat every race like the Tour de France - so everybody
>has to agree when it "really counts".
>
>Vas

I agree--baseball games seem to have a higher variance than other sports. Even
the roster has major changes from game to game (pitching). They do play a lot of
regular season games, though, which is nice for stats :)

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.