Author: Alex Shalamanov
Date: 22:29:00 09/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2005 at 13:12:18, J.Dufek wrote: >Fritz is useless for correspondence games. He didn't find any deeper positional >ideas, his evalution have tendency be to close 0,00, he tends play with king to >corner or play with rook pawn, because null-move etc.... You sound very original. I've got an impression you never analyzed your coorespondence games with Fritz 8.1.2.0 or Deep Fritz 8. Right, Fritz's play is more attacking or combinatory in style but it understands good positional chess too. Fruit 2.1 is a weakie against Fritz in both attacking or positional chess. I used to test them on Nunn2 Test 1st position: English Hedgehog. It's in this position where the positional knowledge or skills are checked. Fritz gave no chance to Fruit 2.1 with the score: 6.5-3.5. It's true that I prefer attacking chess more but you can't always hope for picking your own apples, so positional games are not rare visitors in my practice. I think it's not for nothing that Garri Kasparov uses Fritz as his computer assistant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.