Author: J.Dufek
Date: 22:52:05 09/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2005 at 01:29:00, Alex Shalamanov wrote: >On September 12, 2005 at 13:12:18, J.Dufek wrote: > >>Fritz is useless for correspondence games. He didn't find any deeper positional >>ideas, his evalution have tendency be to close 0,00, he tends play with king to >>corner or play with rook pawn, because null-move etc.... > >You sound very original. I've got an impression you never analyzed your >coorespondence games with Fritz 8.1.2.0 or Deep Fritz 8. Right, Fritz's play Bad impression. Lot of my analysis i made with Fritz, because my opponents play with him. But results are very very bad. It's only about own experience - you have maybe very good results with Fritz, because he understand yours positions, but for my work (pls look at iccf.com for my rating) is uselles. 3 months ago i analyzed one my corr. position - he offer for opponent 3 or 4 moves (totaly different) with evalution 0,00. This is not only one position... is >more attacking or combinatory in style but it understands good positional chess >too. Fruit 2.1 is a weakie against Fritz in both attacking or positional chess. >I used to test them on Nunn2 Test 1st position: English Hedgehog. It's in this >position where the positional knowledge or skills are checked. Fritz gave no >chance to Fruit 2.1 with the score: 6.5-3.5. It's true that I prefer attacking >chess more but you can't always hope for picking your own apples, so positional >games are not rare visitors in my practice. >I think it's not for nothing that Garri Kasparov uses Fritz as his computer >assistant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.