Author: Marc Lacrosse
Date: 14:18:07 09/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2005 at 14:57:40, Thomas Logan wrote: >Well actually Sandro's setting Columbus egg > >at classical time control, 256m hash, all 3,4,5 men tablebases >16m Fruit plays with Fruit_ASv3.ctg as well as book_small.bin >engine book > >Shredder with s9.ctg > >Windows xp home, a64 3400 > >THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30' 0 > > 123 >1 Shredder 9 011 2.0/3 >2 Fruit 2.1 100 1.0/3 Dear Thomas, I am busy testing shredder 9 with or without Sandro's Columbus Egg against FruitX (WCCC'05) with native and experimental parameters at shorter time controls so as to have statistically significant results. I have several _hundreds_ games between these four and my estimation is that I still have no clear result. There is _no signification at all_ publishing three games! This is pretty ridiculous. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.