Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 15:59:10 09/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2005 at 17:18:07, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >On September 13, 2005 at 14:57:40, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>Well actually Sandro's setting Columbus egg >> >>at classical time control, 256m hash, all 3,4,5 men tablebases >>16m Fruit plays with Fruit_ASv3.ctg as well as book_small.bin >>engine book >> >>Shredder with s9.ctg >> >>Windows xp home, a64 3400 >> >>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30' 0 >> >> 123 >>1 Shredder 9 011 2.0/3 >>2 Fruit 2.1 100 1.0/3 > >Dear Thomas, > >I am busy testing shredder 9 with or without Sandro's Columbus Egg against >FruitX (WCCC'05) with native and experimental parameters at shorter time >controls so as to have statistically significant results. >I have several _hundreds_ games between these four and my estimation is that I >still have no clear result. >There is _no signification at all_ publishing three games! >This is pretty ridiculous. > >Marc btw Previously played and reported at classical time control 50 game shredder vs fruit - won by shredder 50 games fritz vs fruit - drawn 20 games toga/fruit vs Shredder won by shredder at 40 min bliz 50 games Fruit/toga vs Shreder won by fruit/toga at 5 min blitz 20 games Fruit vs Shredder won by shredder Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.