Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 18:02:18 09/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2005 at 17:18:07, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >On September 13, 2005 at 14:57:40, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>Well actually Sandro's setting Columbus egg >> >>at classical time control, 256m hash, all 3,4,5 men tablebases >>16m Fruit plays with Fruit_ASv3.ctg as well as book_small.bin >>engine book >> >>Shredder with s9.ctg >> >>Windows xp home, a64 3400 >> >>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30' 0 >> >> 123 >>1 Shredder 9 011 2.0/3 >>2 Fruit 2.1 100 1.0/3 > >Dear Thomas, > >I am busy testing shredder 9 with or without Sandro's Columbus Egg against >FruitX (WCCC'05) with native and experimental parameters at shorter time >controls so as to have statistically significant results. >I have several _hundreds_ games between these four and my estimation is that I >still have no clear result. >There is _no signification at all_ publishing three games! >This is pretty ridiculous. > >Marc Why not? People can look at these to check out the playing style of his setting, and perhaps if it makes different moves from the regular setting. It may also show weaknesses of either setting. No one was claiming one was better or worse based on these and I should hope not! Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.