Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 01:55:07 09/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2005 at 04:42:40, Alex Shalamanov wrote: >On September 14, 2005 at 04:31:36, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On September 14, 2005 at 03:31:03, Alex Shalamanov wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Erwin 1 >>> >>>Rook=99 >>>Bishop=98 >>>Forward pruning=4 >>>Draw Score=-30 >>>King safety=133 >>>Center control=105 >>>Passed pawns=97 >>>Passed pawns endgame=97 >>>Bishop pair=101 >>> >>>Who was the author of that Shredder 9UCI setting? And what's the difference in >>>style compared to Columbus' Egg setting: blitz or longer time control games, >>>positional or combinatory style, etc.? >>> >>>Alex >> >>I am the author...it is just a try to see if this can be an improvement of >>Columbus' egg. >>However I have reduced down to 2 the forward pruning as 4 is too much and can >>miss some tactical combinations. >> >>Sandro > >Does that mean that Stefan's settings are more or less objective positionally >and you tried to make the engine more aggressive? >Alex Yes, I want to kill the opponents as much as possible...I am a nice guy:-) The third setting I made (actually the first one), before Colombus' egg was Shredder 9 SN3, which is somehow the father of Columbus' egg... Shredder 9 SN3 by Sandro Necchi King safety = 112 Center control = 103 rest default This setting was tested a lot by me and the outcome was the following: 1) somehow weaker than Shredder 9 at blitz; about 20 points 2) somehow stronger at long time controls; about 15 points Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.