Author: Steve B
Date: 05:43:22 09/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I don't recall seeing this happen before, but it could be that the increment >between bids, at this level, is $20 and when he placed the last bid, eBay >applied the increment from the previous highest bid from *somebody else*. I >think he would have won it at 1150 if he had not placed that final bid. > >Still Seems Strange Though Regards, dosent it? that would mean the winner actually cost himself more money by placing a covering bid i have seen an auction end where the winners name appears as the first and second bidder but with the same amount so in this case it should read winner...1150 winner...1150 not a higher price for the same winning bidder i realize it is not a big difference (only about 3 Euro)espcially after the price this baby sold for..but its still odd Outer Limits Regards Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.