Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 12:05:08 09/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2005 at 12:21:39, TEERAPONG TOVIRAT wrote: > >Peter, > >> >>It may be true that Go is more positional and less tactical than Chess but that >>is hard to quantify. > >I'm curious to figure out this. I give 80:20 for chess because most of the games >of under 2400 in chess Olympiad lose by tactical combination. For an expert in Just because the end of a game is a tactical combination doesn't mean the game was lost *because* of tactics. Often the combination comes about because of positional superiority or positional pressure at least. >Go how often he loses by tactical combination? Could it be up to 10%? I don't know. > >Regards, >Teerapong
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.