Author: Alex Shalamanov
Date: 21:26:22 09/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2005 at 23:16:20, Ryan B. wrote: >Cool, sounds like the addition of History pruning if Hiarcs did not already use >it or some other form of pruning that can be somewhat aggresive in node count >reduction. I hope it gains as much positionaly as it does tacticaly. Even Hiarcs 9 was a super strong positional engine that combined good positional play with tactical tricks when it was apt. However, what I like most about Hiarcs 9 is his sound endgame technique. The article says the H10 search speed tends to be 20% slower than of H9. It's okay for a correspondence chess player like me because positions are usually analyzed for quite a while, but what about the testers or engine-engine match enthusiasts? Do you rate it as a drawback or a benefit? ;) Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.