Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 08:12:27 09/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
Looking forward to Xinix's performance in Leiden in November :) Ernst. On September 15, 2005 at 02:18:21, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 14, 2005 at 17:05:59, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>Because Zappa 1.1 is SMP and 64 bit, I gave it a try and was pleasant suprised. >>One of my favourite chess positions is this one, where Kasparov played Rxd4. >>How do other engines do? If your engine finds it please give it a couple of more >>plies to see if it holds it. >> >>Ernst. >> >> >>[D]b2r3r/k4p1p/p2q1np1/NppP4/3p1Q2/P4PPB/1PP4P/1K1RR3 w - - > >XiniX on PM1.7 > >13. -32 32 29257478 1. Nc6+ Bxc6 2. Qxd6 Rxd6 3. dxc6 Kb6 4. Re7 Kxc6 5. >Rxf7 Re8 6. b3 Re2 7. Bc8 Kd5 8. Bb7+ >14. -36 55 49992480 1. Nc6+ Bxc6 2. Qxd6 Rxd6 3. dxc6 Kb6 4. Re7 Kxc6 5. >Rxf7 Re8 6. Kc1 Re2 7. Rd2 Re3 8. Bc8 Kd5 >14. -15 104 93913961 1. Rxd4 Bxd5 2. Rxd5 Nxd5 3. Qxf7+ Nc7 4. Re6 Rd7 5. >Rxd6 Rxf7 6. Nc6+ Ka8 7. Ne5 Rff8 8. Rc6 Kb7 >15. -6 183 164090827 1. Rxd4 Bxd5 2. Rxd5 Nxd5 3. Qxf7+ Nc7 4. Re6 Rd7 5. >Rxd6 Rxf7 6. Nc6+ Ka8 7. Ne5 Rg7 8. f4 Re8 9. Bd7 > >It seems I learned a good lesson from Fruit's code: Less but more debugged >knowledge is better than more but less debugged knowledge :) > >Commenting out a lot of exceptions (and with it a lot of bugs) seems to be one >of the best things I did this year. And I was convinced, knowing these >exceptions was important :( > >Tony > > > >> >>CPU0: AuthenticAMD AMD64 Family 15 Model 43 Stepping 1 2203 MHz >>CPU1: AuthenticAMD AMD64 Family 15 Model 43 Stepping 1 2203 MHz >>GUI: Tablebases with 5 pieces found! [Cache: 16 MB + internal 13.67 MB] >>Engine: Zappa 1.1 (1024 MB) >>by Anthony Cozzie >> 9.00 0:01 -0.23 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Rxc6 4.c3 dxc3 5.Re7+ Kb6 >>6.bxc3 (2.190.136) 1401 >> 10.00 0:01 -0.08 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Nd5 4.c3 dxc3 5.c7 f5 >>(2.585.518) 1414 >> 10.00 0:03 -0.08 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Nd5 4.c3 dxc3 5.c7 f5 >>(4.590.886) 1498 >> 11.00 0:03 -0.14 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Kb6 4.Re7 Kxc6 5.Rxf7 Re8 >>6.c3 (5.088.000) 1507 >> 11.00 0:05 -0.14 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Kb6 4.Re7 Kxc6 5.Rxf7 Re8 >>6.c3 (8.923.952) 1568 >> 12.00 0:07 -0.55 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Kb6 4.Re7 Kxc6 5.Rde1 Nd5 >>6.Rxf7 b4 (12.367.553) 1567 >> 12.00 0:17 -0.55 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Kb6 4.Re7 Kxc6 5.Rde1 Nd5 >>6.Rxf7 b4 (28.349.537) 1621 >> 13.00 0:19 -0.29 1.Nc6+ Bxc6 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.dxc6 Kb6 4.Re7 Kxc6 5.Rde1 Rf8 >>6.f4 Nd7 7.b3 (31.282.737) 1623 >> 13.00 0:32 -0.25 1.Rxd4 cxd4 2.Re7+ Kb6 3.Qxd4+ Kxa5 4.b4+ Ka4 5.Qc3 Bxd5 >>6.Kb2 Qc5 7.bxc5 Rhe8 (53.481.819) 1643 >> 13.00 0:40 -0.20 1.Rxd4 Bxd5 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rd3 Kb6 4.b4 Re8 5.Rxe8 Nxe8 >>6.Rc3 cxb4 7.axb4 (67.094.549) 1676 >> 13.00 0:41 -0.20 1.Rxd4 Bxd5 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rd3 Kb6 4.b4 Re8 5.Rxe8 Nxe8 >>6.Rc3 cxb4 7.axb4 (69.988.250) 1676 >> 14.00 1:27 -0.08 1.Rxd4 Rhf8 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rd2 Kb6 4.b4 Rxd5 5.Nb3 cxb4 >>6.axb4 Rxd2 7.Nxd2 Re8 (150.876.641) 1721 >> 14.00 1:46 -0.08 1.Rxd4 Rhf8 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rd2 Kb6 4.b4 Rxd5 5.Nb3 cxb4 >>6.axb4 Rxd2 7.Nxd2 Re8 (183.700.881) 1719 >> 15.00 2:49 -0.23 1.Rxd4 Bxd5 2.Rxd5 Nxd5 3.Qxf7+ Nc7 4.Re6 Rd7 5.Rxd6 Rxf7 >>6.Nc6+ Ka8 7.Ne5 Re7 8.f4 Rhe8 (293.486.566) 1734 >> 15.00 3:59 -0.23 1.Rxd4 Bxd5 2.Rxd5 Nxd5 3.Qxf7+ Nc7 4.Re6 Rd7 5.Rxd6 Rxf7 >>6.Nc6+ Ka8 7.Ne5 Re7 8.f4 Rhe8 (412.069.282) 1721 >> 16.00 7:20 -0.15 1.Rxd4 Rhg8 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rf4 Kb6 4.b4 cxb4 5.axb4 Nxd5 >>6.Rxf7 Nxb4 7.Nb3 Bd5 8.Rxh7 Bxf3 (741.746.107) 1684 >> 16.00 9:54 -0.15 1.Rxd4 Rhg8 2.Qxd6 Rxd6 3.Rf4 Kb6 4.b4 cxb4 5.axb4 Nxd5 >>6.Rxf7 Nxb4 7.Nb3 Bd5 8.Rxh7 Bxf3 (991.280.574) 1666 >>best move: Rd1xd4 time: 9:59.797 min n/s: 1.666.541 nodes: 991.280.574
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.